Menu Skip to Menu
close
Play

On the higher good

Summary

Craig Calhoun asks whether human rights are likely to endure.

Summary

Craig Calhoun asks whether human rights are likely to endure.

Transcript

I think that’s a question that’s really important. So can the modern idea of human rights survive without reference to God, without a theistic grounding? My own sense is probably yes, but it can’t survive without grounding. 

The Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor had a way of thinking about this that I think is helpful. Religion teaches us that there are some things we consider higher goods – more important than just having a bit more food or a better car to drive. We have different ideas of higher goods. For some people, it’s a religious idea, and the higher good is what pleases God or what’s worshipful to God. But for other people, there may still be higher goods; human rights may even be such a higher good. 

What threatens human rights is the flattening that says there are no higher goods, that nothing is more important than just a cost-benefit analysis of the material pleasures it can bring us. And so I think human rights depends on something religion exemplifies – the idea that there are things that are more important than this moment or mere material reality. But we don’t get those only from religion.